NFPA MUST recognize the Exterior Fire Attack Position
Blanchat is currently working with the NFPA 1906 and 1500 committees to have the Exterior Fire Attack Position recognized in future versions of these standards as a safer method of fighting fast-moving fine fuel fires.
UPDATE: The Exterior Fire Attack Position has passed the 1906 committee and will be included in the 2016 NFPA 1906 standard! Additionally, the NFPA 1500 committee is just beginning to review possible revisions to the NFPA 1500 standard. What the NFPA 1500 committee needs most is to hear from you! Visit the NFPA 1500 page below to learn how you can submit your comments and recommendations.
NFPA 1906 info
NFPA 1500 info
Blanchat has been leading the charge to have the NFPA recognize the Exterior Fire Attack Position and has even been featured on the local news during one of the burn demonstrations with NFPA committee members. Featured news clip below.
Go to the news page
The NFPA needs your input!
The NFPA 1500 committee needs to hear your input on why the Exterior Fire Attack Position is important in fine fuel areas! Unfortunately, you must do this via the NFPA website with a unique user name and password. We have created a step by step set of instructions to complete this process.
Input must be submitted by the deadline 5/16/2016.
Download instructions
Apparatus with an Exterior Fire Attack Position Currently on the Market
These pictures were taken at the TEEX Municipal Vendor Show in College Station, TX. All but two of these trucks have positions behind the cab. One truck has a position on the front bumper and one at the rear of the truck.
Current Manufacturers of an Exterior Fire Attack Position
Skeeter Brush Trucks (Kirby, Texas)
http://www.skeeterbrushtrucks.com/index.php
http://www.skeeterbrushtrucks.com/owners.php
https://www.facebook.com/skeeterbrushtrucks
Wildfire Truck & Equipment Sales (Alvarado, TX)
http://www.brushtruck.com/default.asp
http://www.brushtruck.com/recent.asp
Neel Fire (Waco, TX)
http://www.neelfire.com/trucks/wildland.php
Midwest Fire (Luverne, MN)
http://midwestfire.com/apparatus/quick-attack/brush-trucks/
Hays Fire & Rescue (Hays, KS)
http://www.haysfireandrescue.net/Truck_Gallery_OCWG.php
Deep South Fire Trucks (Seminary, MS)
http://deepsouthfiretrucks.com/brush-trucks/
Emergency Fire Equipment (Mayfield, KS)
http://www.e-fire.net/home/trucksapparatus.html
Maintainer Custom Bodies (Rock Rapids, IA)
http://mcbfire.com/deliveries/quick-attack-george-ia/?recent=1
Chief Fire & Safety (Chickasha, OK)
http://www.chieffire-safety.com/deliveries
Danko Emergency Equipment (Snyder, NE)
http://www.danko.net/apparatus/flatbed-wildland-attack
http://www.danko.net/apparatus/mega-flatbed-wildland-attack
http://www.danko.net/new-deliveries
Unruh Fire (Sedgwick, KS)
http://www.unruhfire.com/brush-trucks/
Weis Fire & Safety (Salina, KS)
http://weisfiresafety.com/fire-trucks/quick-attack
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Weis-Fire-Safety-Equipment-Company-Inc/164252860263620
1st Due (Bartlett, KS)
AMI-Fire Equipment (Brenham, TX)
http://www.ami-fire.com/inventory.asp?cat=475
http://www.ami-fire.com/results.asp#mid
Daco Fire Equipment (Fort Worth, TX)
http://www.dacofire.com/?q=node/126
Steele Fire Apparatus (Haskell, TX)
http://www.sfabrushfiretrucks.com/smbrush.html
http://www.sfabrushfiretrucks.com/lgbrush.html
Turnkey Industries (Magnolia, TX)
http://www.tkind.com/emergency-vehicles.html
Westex Fire (West, TX)
http://westexfire.com/gallery/2623544
1st Attack (Waterloo, IN)
http://1stattack.com/trucks/fire-trucks/
Metro Fire (Houston, TX)
http://www.mfas.com/index.php/fire-trucks/arlington3
Kyrish Government Group (Killeen, Texas)
http://kyrishgovt.com/brush-truck/
Crow Construction (Cashion, OK)
http://www.crowconstruction.com/brushpumper.html
J&J Custom Fire (Red Rock, OK)
http://www.jandjcustomfire.com/index.html
http://www.jandjcustomfire.com/galleries/garber.html
http://www.jandjcustomfire.com/galleries/hawley.html
http://www.jandjcustomfire.com/galleries/perry.html
http://www.jandjcustomfire.com/galleries/skedee.html
Company Two Fire Apparatus (Varnville, SC)
http://www.companytwofire.com/Public/InventoryVehicle.aspx?id=8112
Southeast Apparatus (Corbin, KY)
http://www.southeastapparatus.com/2014-deliveries.html
Pierce (Appleton, WI)
http://www.piercemfg.com/en/trucks/federal-government/wildland.aspx
Cooper Creek Mfg (Loyal, OK)
http://www.coopercreekmfg.com/index.htm
https://www.facebook.com/CooperCreekMfg
Heiman Fire Equipment (Sioux Falls, SD)
http://www.heimanfiretrucks.com/equipment.php?equip=wildland
Blanchat Manufacturing (Harper, KS)
http://www.blanchatmfg.com/trucks
If Blanchat is building 40 trucks per year with an exterior fire attack position, how many total trucks are being sold in North America with 29+ manufacturers selling the exterior fire attack position on their apparatus?
How many of these new exterior fire attack positions are sufficiently safe in the event of an impact or roll-over?
- Greg Blanchat

What Fine Fuel Firefighters Say
-
As Chief of an all volunteer F.D. serving an area of approximately 50 sq. miles in west central Douglas County, KS I firmly support provisions for an exterior FF position for fine fuel fires. An appropriately engineered design will allow us to better serve our jurisdiction. Over 40% of our responses result from agricultural burns that get out of control. We have tried a remote control turret and found that to be less useful than expected. It required significant custom fabrication and is very hard to control. A single FF with a .75" whip line is far more effective. Many on my department have suffered undue heat stress, trips and snags while dragging a hose line in a fast moving ground cover fire. We NEED a more practical and SAFE solution as we continue to loose volunteers!
Duane Filkins, Fire Chief
Kanwaka FD
Lawrence, KS -
I understand that the NFPA is in the process of considering changes to 1906 section 14.4 standards (Exterior Attack Fire Position) that would allow for a pump and roll fire attack position on wildland fire engines. I have had wildland fire experience since 1959 both on the ground and as a T2 Incident Commander. I was a District Ranger for the USDA Forest Service for 25 of those years. During all of that time I have dug fire line, ran fire crews, operated fire engines, managed Incident Overhead Teams and worked with co-operating agencies, including volunteer fire departments. Fire fighter safety was always my top consideration. That is why I feel so strong that what you are considering must addressed. I would make the following comments for your consideration.
Presently we have wildland fire engines that can drive up the road with the crew in the cab and set up to pump water to a fire or let someone walk along with the engine. That is good for that kind of a fires. But in the great Plains and other areas with fine fuels we need a different fire engine, that can pump and roll, that is built with safety standards and improved efficiency for fast moving wildfires. Most of this need is not meet with State or Federal agencies but with rural volunteer fire departments. An example is the State of Kansas which has 50 million acres of which 95% of all land is protected by rural volunteer fire departments.
A number of people have been working on this issue of standard changes for a number of years. It is time to get the job done and make the needed safety changes. In the last three years I have seen a lot of fire engines being purchased by fire districts and counties that have the behind the cab walk through design but they do not have the safety features needed to protect the fire fighter. They are lacking the ROPS and other standards needed for safety. Fire fighters know the value of the design changes you are considering. Now NFPA needs to set the standards so vehicles will be built and used properly and safely.
I have talked with fire fighters who work on the ground and a large number of them agree it is time to make some changes for the safety of the fire fighter working on the engines with fast moving fires in fine fuels. Sticking the nozzle out the cab window is not the answer. The proposed new standards being considered would make for a safe fire attack position on a fire engine and would allow for a behind cab, ROPS with stand-up/sit down, walk through access and proper safety harness.
The fire fighters on the ground are asking for and deserve this change. Let us move forward to a safe future while building on the past.Joe F. Hartman
USDAFS - Retired -
Stewart D. Bryan, Fire ChiefCurrently our department has the capability with two apparatus to pump and roll with a firefighter safely buckled into a harness and protected by a rollover protection system. This system, created by Blanchat Manufacturing, was researched by our department and compared to many other systems and we believe it is the safest on the market and have seen its use as essential on the Urban interface and Wildfire scene.
Firefighter safety is always first with our department, period. This style of rollover protection gives our department the capability to fight fire with the precision and effectiveness of a firefighter at the controls of the nozzle nestled safely in a protective enclosure. Our department views this as an advantage over the use of a monitor because of precision and conservation of water. This system also allows for the firefighter to be evacuated from the hazards of the fire scene in an expedient manner without the possibility of being hit by the apparatus while keeping the fatigue factor low for our personnel. With wireless communication capability included, it also provides a wider, more efficient view of the scene by the firefighter while the driver can concentrate on safe driving practices. We plan on adding additional apparatus of this configuration as our community grows and our Urban Interface fires increase. They have been essential to our firefighting needs and are under heavy demand by our mutual aid departments because of their safety and effectiveness.
City of Greenwood Fire Department
Greenwood, AR -
Andy McCaslinJust got finished reading your story about "pump and rolling" being a volunteer from Paden, Ok I have seen many wildland fires first hand that we have had to drive over 10mph to keep up with, and that was on the flanks god knows how fast the head is moving. I have watched forestry personnell which have no cages or tailboards because of NFPA rules get beat by many fires, and this has resulted in the loss of structures which could have been avoided if the "pump and roll method" was used. On the same day as the okc fires this year we also had our hands full, with winds blowing 40+ that day ground crews (walking, raking, or backfireing) were useless. We were called to a grass fire (one of 9 that day) with structures in danger, two trucks arrived on scene with the head blowing perpidicular to structure, but the flank of course was headed towards the structure, I had a new firefighter with me and for "NFPA safety reasons" I had him walk alongside the truck to try and make head way on the flank (stucture side) we tried this for about 10 minutes with no avail, he could not keep up. We finally did the pump and roll and saved the structure by 100 feet. When riding and fighting you have several things working in your favor, speed, knowing where your partner is all the time, less water consumation, and to me the greatest ability is to turn around fast and get flare ups behind you so you can effectively work the flank. Also this day the wind was blowing in different directions, a walking firefighter has a greater chance of getting burned by switching winds than one riding. I was the driver that day and my partner was on the truck I was able to pay attention to fire behavior where he is not able to, the wind switced and I could see in the distance this happening,we had 15-20 foot tall fire that came back towards the black (where we were) if he had been on the ground he would have been burned but since he was on the truck I acknowledged and got us away from fire and kept him safe. Hats off to you on this issue.
Paden Vol. F.D.
Paden, OK -
Tyler SchrantI agree that a change needs to be made. As a volunteer fire fighter it is not ideal to walk beside a truck. There are many risk factors to that if the smoke is heavy enough the fire fighter walking could be seriously injured by the driver a long with many other possibilities. I believe a roll cage added to a wildland apparatus is entirely the way to go. It will be safer and faster to allow this change. Please understand when you are out there putting your life on the line anything to limit accidents should be considered.
Oklahoma Volunteer FF
































Blanchat Mfg., Inc.


